- Consumer
Recent Developments
■ The Cost of Love: Cora lived with Bernie for 22 years handling
all household matters, including, cooking, cleaning, and so forth. Bernie
must’ve been listening to Paul Simon’s tune (50 ways to leave your lover…) and
the couple broke up. Cora filed a palimony suit
but Bernie died before the matter resolved. Bernie’s estate claimed a
deduction for the palimony claim. The IRS disagreed and the case ended up
before the 9th Circuit which held that it was likely that Nevada would join
other states (e.g., Arizona and California) in finding that homemaking services
like those rendered by Cora can be adequate consideration for a
property-sharing agreement between cohabitants, and hence a palimony claim.
That claim had to be valued as of the date of Bernie’s death. Estate of Bernard
Shapiro v. U.S.
, 107 AFTR 2d 2011-XXXX (9th Cir.).
■ Time in a Bottle: So you beef ‘cause your lawyer keeps time
records, but you had best do the same. Losses on passive activities, like
owning a limited partnership interest in a real estate rental partnership, are
limited as to how they can be deducted. One out is if you meet the requirements
to be classified as a real estate professional. IRC Sec. 469(c)(7). This
exception from the harsh passive loss rules requires that more than half of
personal services performed during a tax year are real property businesses with
“material participation”, and that you provide more than 750 hours of service
for those businesses during the year.
The taxpayer kept detailed time records, but failed to meet the 750 hour test.
Taxpayer spent 1,003 hours managing real estate, but 324 of the hours were
spent on operating a short-term (less than 7 day rentals, like a hotel) rental
property. Short term rentals aren’t considered a rental activity under the IRS
rules. Temp. Reg. 1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii) . 1,003 – 324 = only 679 < 750! Bailey
, TC Summ. Op. 2011-22 (Tax Ct.)
Remember Jim Croce’s lyrics: “If I could save time in a bottle the first thing that
I’d like to do is meet the passive loss rules…”
