Recent Developments

Wash sale Rules:

These rules prevent you from claiming a tax loss on selling a stock if shortly
before or after that sale you’ve acquired substantially the same stock. The
rationale is you haven’t really realized a tax loss if you still own
substantially the same stock.

The
IRS has just expanded the reach of the Wash Sale rules under Code Section 1091.  You cannot deduct a tax loss on the
sale of any securities if, within a period 30 days before the sale through 30
days after the sale, you acquire substantially identical securities. A recent
ruling has held that if you sell securities for a loss and have your IRA or
Roth IRA purchase substantially identical securities within 30 days before or
after the sale, you will not be able to claim the tax loss on the sale of the securities.
Rev. Rul. 2008-5, 2008-3 IRB. Further, your tax basis in your IRA or Roth IRA
will not be increased under IRC Sec. 1091(d) .

Innocent Spouse Relief:

A husband and wife are jointly liable for the tax on any
joint income tax return. However, if you can demonstrate that you did not know,
or have reason to know, of your spouse’s tax hanky panky, you can get off the
tax hook. This “out” is known as innocent spouse relief.  IRC Sec. 6015.

Innocent spouse relief is an issue in
divorces when one spouse seeks to avoid the tax liability for the misdeeds of
an ex-spouse. Unfortunately, it’s not easy to qualify for relief. You have to
demonstrate that you filed a joint income tax return and the tax understatement
was due to the erroneous items of your spouse. You must show that you did not
know, or have reason to know, of the problem. Finally, it must be unfair to
hold you responsible. In a recent case the wife, who was college educated, had
access to joint financial accounts, balanced the couple’s checkbook, and was
aware of the couple’s ownership of limited partnership interests that trigged
the tax understatement, didn’t qualify. The court felt she did not meet her
duty to inquire into the transactions. Robert Golden, et ux. V. Comr. (2007) TC Memo
2007-299.